Of course not!
We are all aware that Her Majesty the Queen recently invested in a company called
www.getmapping.com that plans to produce a detailed airphoto map of the UK.
Although these airphotos could be used to assist in the location potentially contaminated areas, this of course is not newsworthy
All we are really interested in hearing apparently, is that thanks to this investment, the Queen is now a 'dot-com' millionairess!
However a new website
www.homecheck.com
claims that there is also a high likelyhood that the land at Buckingham Palace is contaminated, and that No 10 Downing Street has a dark industrial past which has left a high risk of contamination.
In all probability the contamination at Buckingham Palace is derived from Heavy Metal - as well meaning staff no doubt tried to stunt the growth of Prince Charles interest in Camellia's (the key to their late flowering seems to be the move from a phytogenic to a photogenic environment). If playing Mozart to chicks is supposed to encourage laying, then a bit of Metallica at full-volume will probably stunt anyones growth (it certainly did for Napster's).
As for No 10, well what else can it be but dry-cleaning fluid (the people's trichloroethane to the likes of you and me), afterall spindoctors thrive on it, being as they are - dense, non aqueous, and hazardous to the ozone layer.